Plot Tensions: Set ‘Em Up Before You Knock ‘Em Down
May 16, 2011 2 Comments
[Today's guest blogger is Lynda Williams. Lynda is the author of the ten-novel Okal Rel Saga, set in a future full of bold characters, unique cultures, love, blood and humor. She taught in computing fields for many years, and currently works as an instructional designer for BCIT. Saga books can be read individually, as appetizers, or from end to end for the full meal deal. Latest book in print is Avim's Oath from Edge Science Fiction and Fantasy, , the sixth in the series.]
Any story relies on some sort of set up to deliver an emotional impact.
Very short stories do it by exploiting pre-existing plot clichés. A novel that start with a bang ease us into the real story afterwards. Spoofs and fan fiction capitalize on the “setting ‘em up” work done by well-known series, resolving tensions left untapped in canon.
Setting up tensions in original fiction is hard work.
I write a ten-novel series set in a universe with its own social norms and cultures. Many of the funniest or most poignant moments would have little impact divorced from context. Take this exchange in the third novel, Pretenders, for example:
“I can’t believe I slept with you!” Ayrium erupted aloud. And flushed crimson, because that was not what she had meant to say first.
Ameron’s smile faded ruefully. “I cannot believe I forgot I was not taking ferni,” he replied.
The passage can elicit squeals from a reader who understands the sexual-politics of the Sevolite empire. Curiosity is the best it can inspire in isolation.
Part of the pleasure of SF is discovering how the world you are reading about “works”. A lot of the necessary learning can be slipped in through the behaviour of supporting characters, so beware of making every character a rebel because it makes for uphill work establishing societal norms. Create questions in the reader’s mind before you answer them. Suspense has to be built up, and then delivered, never draining the whole charge until the end.
In my ten novel series, clues sprinkled through the earlier books never contradict the truths revealed in later ones, but are part of the background until their turn arrives. For example, the main plot is busy getting a worried Erien in to visit Ameron in Book 4: Throne Price, when he encounters a curious hazard.
Erien squinted against the optical illusion induced by the Lorel Stairs, concentrating on the woman’s broad shoulders and strong features. “It’s the tiles,” he realized. “and the patterns in them.”
“Just like the Flashing Floor,” Zind said. “You’ll have heard of that.”
The character, Zind, features again in Book 6: Avim’s Oath. The Lorel Stairs and Flashing Floor continue to be just part of the setting until Books 10: Unholy Science. Someone re-reading the series would recognize them in this passing scene.
Even within a single book, or chapter, you can lay the groundwork for setting up big tensions while creating and discharging lesser ones. In Book 1: The Courtesan Prince, Ann’s sexual appraisal of each man she runs into helps keep the story lively until she actually meets “Beauty” – who turns out to be Pureblood Prince Amel, the archetypal prince raised as a commoner. It never bothered me that readers would quickly guess Amel is the “courtesan prince” of the title. The reader knows before the characters do, and keeps reading to discover what is going to happen when they start figuring it out. The harder work was establishing backstory for the cultures to explain the anachronistic use of swords (to limit warfare) and the nature of Sevolites (elite bioengineered sub-race of humans). Fortunately, I had lots of space to introduce all the variations and quirks.
Plotting is like an emotional symphony with movements: big themes echo through the whole work, while smaller passages rise and fall within the larger envelope. But big or small, you have to set ‘em up before you knock ‘em down. And there’s no way to do it in a really original way unless you and the reader do the work.



“The reader knows before the characters do, and keeps reading to discover what is going to happen when they start figuring it out.”
That’s always a tricky thing to do. In my upcoming novel (the summer, from the look of it), Abi, Shaman Within, I spent a lot of time setting up my 1st person narrator as unreliable regarding her own heritage. This required some tricks and attention, making it clear why she has this blind spot while the reader does not. 3rd person would have made it easier, but not as fun.
While doing that sort of thing, a writer should take care to not make mini-mysteries all over the work. These tend to frustrate the reader. The classic example that I’ve read a million times is to introduce a character and then five paragraphs down write, “And it was John.” My brain immediately says, “Oh, come on! Why did I have to wait five paragraphs just to find out it was John? Is the writer really that impoverished with ideas?”
Chuckle. Agree 100% about the “it was John” mini-mystery. I find 3rd person more fun than 1st, as a rule, so I’ll disagree there. I was asked, by the editor, about the “Won’t everyone guess Von is Amel?” question. My answer was, the book isn’t a mystery where the suspense lies in guessing which character dunnit, or in this case is the missing prince. I totally agree that if the plot tension had centered around deducing which character was “The Courtesan Prince”, it has to be something a bit harder to figure out. But I was more interested in making the failure of others to recognize “Von is Amel” believable, to illustrate cultural blindness, and in seeing how people’s attitudes change as they discover the truth.
I’d think doing an unreliable 1st person narrator would be tricky, too. Someone lying to herself? I guess that’s where the tricks and attention come in. But I have lots of respect and enthusiasm for authors doing something a bit tricky. It’s too easy to “write down” to readers in the age of inattention. But when I get caught up in a book, I’m likely to be caught up in it BECAUSE it demands a bit more of me than the simplest, most straightforward interpretation of events. Congrats on your upcoming release, with Loconeal, Gary. http://loconeal.com/2011/02/23/new-author-and-contributing-editor-gary-wedlund/